МакДональдз Україна звинувачує президента Буша
03/21/2003 | МакДон
Цікаву інформацію розіслав вчора київський офіс МакДональдз Україна підрозділам і робітникам компанії в Україні в вигляді електронного повідомлення. Автором повідомлення виявився такий собі Желько Марчек, один з керівників компанії.
Виявляється, керівники МакДональдз Україна НЕ ПІДТРИМУЮТЬ США у війні з Іраком! Навпаки, МакДоналдз Україна звинувачує президента Буша у корисних інтересах у війні в Іраку. Так, в повідомленні говориться, що війни в Іраку 1991 і 2003 року є в інтересах американських нафтових корпорацій. МакДоналдз Україна натякає, що президент Буш керується інтересами американських компаній.
МакДоналдх Україна також повідомляє, що війна в Афганістані насправді була не проти бін Ладена і Аль Кайди, а за нафту!
Чи такою заявою МакДональдз Україна старається захистити себе від нападок антиглобалістів (як показане у новинах http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/030321/170/3kseo.html ), у повідомленні не говориться.
Досі коментарів. Цитати з повідомлення МакДоналдз Юкрейн:
..."Now all is clear… USA have made a profit of 20$
billion from the war! It had nothing to do with “Free Kuwait”… they were only after the “cheese” !"
..."Where did the $ 40 billion spent for the war go? To the war industry, all of which just happens to be almost exclusively… AMERICAN!!!
..."Now it is easy to assume that the Gulf war in 1991, happened for financial reasons only, and not for some “humanitarian reason” or for the “right to freedom”."
..."But now it is easy to understand two other events: the reason behind the war in Afghanistan and the new war against Iraq"
..."The war in Afghanistan had as a main target the installation of a pawn government that would agree with the construction of a pipe line (American owned), of 2.500 km length that would run across its territory. This strategically important pipe line, has as unique alternative, the construction of another one, of 5.500 km lenght, much more costly to construct and maintain, due to the taxes that would be imposed to the USA by the countries through which it would run. It is much easier to reduce to dust a country already tormented by 30 years of war and turn it into your annex, with the possibility of constructing and managing the shortest pipe line without any trouble at all."
..."So, the Bush administration has a goal: to find an alternative oil supplier except for Saudi Arabia in the Middle East."
...The easiest way, of course, is a war in Iraq and the installation of a pawn government under USA guidance. The answer that spontaneously comes to mind is “Why Iraq?”
For 3 simple reasons:
* It is a country that cannot defend itself (poverty due to the embargo is killing 300.000 babies/year due to malnutrition).
* Iraq offers an easy excuse (the presence of non-existent weapons of mass destruction, that can be only produced with high technology which Iraq does not have) to justify the attack to the International community that knows nothing about oil deposits.
*Until now, Iraq does not have the support of a powerful nation, that would be in the position to withstand the American threat."
Виявляється, керівники МакДональдз Україна НЕ ПІДТРИМУЮТЬ США у війні з Іраком! Навпаки, МакДоналдз Україна звинувачує президента Буша у корисних інтересах у війні в Іраку. Так, в повідомленні говориться, що війни в Іраку 1991 і 2003 року є в інтересах американських нафтових корпорацій. МакДоналдз Україна натякає, що президент Буш керується інтересами американських компаній.
МакДоналдх Україна також повідомляє, що війна в Афганістані насправді була не проти бін Ладена і Аль Кайди, а за нафту!
Чи такою заявою МакДональдз Україна старається захистити себе від нападок антиглобалістів (як показане у новинах http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/030321/170/3kseo.html ), у повідомленні не говориться.
Досі коментарів. Цитати з повідомлення МакДоналдз Юкрейн:
..."Now all is clear… USA have made a profit of 20$
billion from the war! It had nothing to do with “Free Kuwait”… they were only after the “cheese” !"
..."Where did the $ 40 billion spent for the war go? To the war industry, all of which just happens to be almost exclusively… AMERICAN!!!
..."Now it is easy to assume that the Gulf war in 1991, happened for financial reasons only, and not for some “humanitarian reason” or for the “right to freedom”."
..."But now it is easy to understand two other events: the reason behind the war in Afghanistan and the new war against Iraq"
..."The war in Afghanistan had as a main target the installation of a pawn government that would agree with the construction of a pipe line (American owned), of 2.500 km length that would run across its territory. This strategically important pipe line, has as unique alternative, the construction of another one, of 5.500 km lenght, much more costly to construct and maintain, due to the taxes that would be imposed to the USA by the countries through which it would run. It is much easier to reduce to dust a country already tormented by 30 years of war and turn it into your annex, with the possibility of constructing and managing the shortest pipe line without any trouble at all."
..."So, the Bush administration has a goal: to find an alternative oil supplier except for Saudi Arabia in the Middle East."
...The easiest way, of course, is a war in Iraq and the installation of a pawn government under USA guidance. The answer that spontaneously comes to mind is “Why Iraq?”
For 3 simple reasons:
* It is a country that cannot defend itself (poverty due to the embargo is killing 300.000 babies/year due to malnutrition).
* Iraq offers an easy excuse (the presence of non-existent weapons of mass destruction, that can be only produced with high technology which Iraq does not have) to justify the attack to the International community that knows nothing about oil deposits.
*Until now, Iraq does not have the support of a powerful nation, that would be in the position to withstand the American threat."