Відповіді

• 2003.03.24 | Patriot

  Re: "Боротьба за мир" по українськи

  Michael Moore ya nikoly ne vvazhav komunistom, bo vin nym i ne je, ale na vruchenni OSKARA vin vystupyv proty vijny i ti scho proty vijny u Evropi tak samo ne komunisty. Vas zanadto propagandoju nakachaly
  згорнути/розгорнути гілку відповідей

  • 2003.03.24 | Богдан

    Майкл Мур комуністом якраз є

    Ні для кого в Голівуді не є секретом його ліві погляди. Тільки комуніст міг зморозити таку муру про недемократичність виборів в США.
    
    Щодо інших протестуючих, то більшість серед них є лівими (не зважаючи на те, що першими Хусейн вирізував саме комуністів). Але ліві йому це охоче вибачають, бо самі не раз користувалися такими методами боротьби за владу. Основне тепер для них - це об"єднатися проти спільного ворога - демократичних виборів. Тут Хусейн є союзником
    
    Інші, які комуністами не є, застосовують комуністичну риторику, тому я їх називаю комуністами. Прочитайте лозунги цих з дозволу сказати мирних демонстрацій. Не поінформованій людині може здатися, що він потрапив в 70 роки і західні ліві партії відробляють нафтодолари прислані з Кремля. Лозунги - один до одного.
    згорнути/розгорнути гілку відповідей

    • 2003.03.24 | Englishman

      А ще за класифікацією Богдана...

      ... комуняками (або дурнями) є 40 американців-володарів Нобелівської премії. Бо посміли підписати протестний лист на початку цього року.

    • 2003.03.24 | Православний Шотляндець

      Re: Майкл Мур комуністом якраз є

      Pravi takozh tsilkom rozsvareni. Tut katehorii "livi-pravi" malo shcho poiasniuiut'. Ide vnytrishnia viina v administratsii Busha--na zhal' Bush sam ie "porozhnia boieholovka".
      
      
      washingtonpost.com
      Conservatives' Uncivil War Over Iraq
      A Policy Debate Turns Bitter and Vindictive
      
      By Howard Kurtz
      Washington Post Staff Writer
      Monday, March 24, 2003; Page C07
      
      
      The conservative movement is in shock and awe over a truly nasty brawl about Iraq.
      
      They're playing for keeps: A former Bush speechwriter is accusing such commentators as Pat Buchanan and Robert Novak of hating America, while Buchanan is complaining of a pro-war "cabal" that is "colluding with Israel."
      
      David Frum, a National Review writer who left the White House last year, lobs the latest grenade in the magazine, saying that those he calls paleoconservatives "deny and excuse terror" and "espouse a potentially self-fulfilling defeatism. . . . They began by hating the neoconservatives. They came to hate their party and this president. They have finished by hating their country."
      
      Says Novak: "It is absolutely outrageous to say that anyone who has criticized the wisdom of this attack on Iraq hates their party and the president, and hates their country. It really poisons the political discourse to say that if you feel this hasn't been a wise decision on the part of the United States, you're criticizing your country and hoping for defeat."
      
      The fault lines have been there all along, but the impassioned arguments over Iraq are ripping apart the right. Gentlemanly discourse about America's role in the world has been replaced by vitriol about ugly motives.
      
      Frum and Novak, a syndicated columnist and "Crossfire" co-host, have tangled before, most notably about Frum's best-selling book "The Right Man."
      
      When Frum announced that he was leaving the White House, Novak took to the CNN airwaves to report "suspicion that he's been kicked out." The reason, Novak said, was administration unhappiness with a widely circulated e-mail from Frum's wife, Danielle Crittenden, crediting him with the "axis of evil" phrase in President Bush's State of the Union address.
      
      In his book, Frum says he considered suing Novak over the report that he was canned. Novak, in turn, panned the book in Buchanan's new magazine, American Conservative, under the headline "Axis of Ego."
      
      The book is written with a "tone of condescension," Novak wrote, and Frum "repeatedly refers to his own Jewishness. It is hard to recall any previous presidential aide so engrossed with his own ethnic roots. Frum is more uncompromising in support of Israel than any other issue, raising the inescapable question of whether this was the real reason he entered the White House."
      
      Novak, who's sometimes been accused of being unsympathetic to Israel, had just poured gasoline on the fire.
      
      After being faxed Frum's National Review piece, Novak says: "I consider this mean-spirited payback for my critical review of his book and other criticism. I've been called a lot of things, but this is the first time I've been called a paleoconservative. He links me with a lot of people I certainly disagree with on a vast number of issues."
      
      "Total delusions of grandeur on his part," says Frum, noting that he began working on the piece two months ago. "I do not take seriously Bob Novak's review of my book. I do take seriously the columns and articles he's done about the war."
      
      But Novak calls the assault "really unacceptable. . . . I have said many times on television that once the shooting starts, all Americans should hope for a decisive and clean victory."
      
      Buchanan, the three-time presidential candidate and MSNBC commentator, is getting his licks in as well. In the American Conservative cover story, he denounces a number of neoconservatives who are Jewish:
      
      "We charge that a cabal of polemicists and public officials seek to ensnare our country in a series of wars that are not in America's interests. We charge them with colluding with Israel to ignite those wars."
      
      Buchanan declares "false" the "toxic" charge that he is anti-Semitic even as he hurls the charge of dual loyalty, saying his critics believe that "what's good for Israel is good for America."
      
      And Buchanan, a onetime Nixon and Reagan aide who abandoned the Republican Party in 2000, casts a wide net: "Their publications include the Weekly Standard, Commentary, the New Republic, National Review, and the editorial pages of the Wall Street Journal. Though few in number, they wield disproportionate power through control of the conservative foundations and magazines, through their syndicated columns and by attaching themselves to men of power." A veritable vast right-wing conspiracy.
      
      Frum peppers his piece with quotations from the antiwar conservatives. In December, he noted, Novak criticized national security adviser Condoleezza Rice for citing Hezbollah, not al Qaeda, as the world's most dangerous terrorist organization. Hezbollah, said Novak, is focused only "on the destruction of Israel," not America.
      
      Buchanan, who did not return calls, declared on MSNBC's "Hardball" last fall: "9/11 was a direct consequence of the United States meddling in an area of the world where we do not belong and where we are not wanted."
      
      Also in the Frum spotlight is Justin Raimondo, who runs an antiwar Web site and who delivered Buchanan's nominating speech at the last Reform Party convention. Raimondo writes that it "seems beyond dispute" that Israel had some prior knowledge of the Sept. 11 attacks.
      
      Frum says his criticism of Novak, Buchanan and other conservatives "is in no way personal. All I talk about is what people have said and what people have written."

    • 2003.03.24 | sych

      Byvachaite, Bohdane, ale vy taku hu..n'u verzete...(-)

  • 2003.03.25 | sych

    A yakyi zv'azok Moora z MacDonal'dsom? :) (-)

• 2003.03.25 | Горпина Пінчук

  А як же ж там нерозрахуєшся?

  Підкажіть, може і я буду з Америкою таким чином боротися. У нас є такі, що у той Макдональдс в туалет безкоштовно прошмигують (нічого не купивши). Тепер я розумію, чого вони це роблять.
  згорнути/розгорнути гілку відповідей

  • 2003.03.25 | Адвокат ...

    Це до них, на решті, українська телевізія донесла

    Горпина Пінчук пише:
    > Підкажіть, може і я буду з Америкою таким чином боротися. У нас є такі, що у той Макдональдс в туалет безкоштовно прошмигують (нічого не купивши). Тепер я розумію, чого вони це роблять.
    
    одне з гасел анти- ґльобалістів: "Шира подяка "МакДональдсу" за десятирічча безкоштовних вбиралень по всьому світі!"